On June 6, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively, the agencies) issued guidance to banking organizations on managing the risks associated with third party relationships. This final guidance reflects the 82 comment letters the agencies received from banking organizations, financial technology (fintech) companies and other third party providers on the proposed guidance released in July 2021 and replaces each agency’s existing guidance to ensure consistency in supervisory enforcement. While the agencies acknowledge that “[t]he use of third parties can offer banking organizations significant benefits, such as quicker and more efficient access to technologies, human capital, delivery channels, products, services, and markets,” they caution that the use of third parties “does not remove the need for sound risk management.” The agencies emphasize, however, that supervisory guidance does not have the force and effect of law and does not impose any new requirements on banking organizations.

According to the agencies, fintech partnerships and other third party relationships include outsourced services, use of independent consultants, referral arrangements, merchant payment processing services, services provided by affiliates and subsidiaries, and joint ventures, and the joint guidance applies to all these types. However, the agencies acknowledge that some relationships require a higher level of oversight or risk management and recommend that banks tailor their risk management approach with respect to such a relationship in light of the potential for heightened risks posed by the relationship. The guidance adheres to prior iterations of third party risk management guidance from the agencies in advising that sound third party risk management must take into account the level of risk, complexity and size of the financial institution as well as the nature of the third party relationship.

Highlights from the guidance include:

  • Emphasizing the importance of identifying and managing risks associated with third party relationships.
  • Maintaining an inventory of all third party relationships and periodically conducting risk assessments for each relationship.
  • Engaging in more rigorous oversight of third party relationships that support “critical activities” such as those:
    • That cause a banking organization significant risk;
    • Have significant customer impact; or
    • Have a significant impact on the banking organization’s finances or operations.
  • Conducting periodic independent reviews to assess the adequacy of third party risk management processes.
  • Documenting and reporting third party risk management processes and specific third party relationships.

The guidance provides suggestions for banking organizations to consider through each stage of its third party relationship “life cycle” from planning, due diligence and third party selection, contract negotiation, ongoing monitoring, and termination. It also provides a list of items examiners will consider in the scope of their supervisory reviews. The agencies indicated they intend to develop additional resources to help community banks manage risks from third party relationships.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Gregory Parisi Gregory Parisi

Greg leverages his broad experience and pragmatic approach, bringing a wealth of knowledge, business insight and practical problem-solving skills to efficiently manage transactions and advise clients in an evolving legal landscape. He combines his corporate and transactional experience with a robust knowledge of…

Greg leverages his broad experience and pragmatic approach, bringing a wealth of knowledge, business insight and practical problem-solving skills to efficiently manage transactions and advise clients in an evolving legal landscape. He combines his corporate and transactional experience with a robust knowledge of bank regulatory issues to provide valued legal solutions for financial institutions, financial technology companies and other businesses. Greg often works closely with clients to design and implement internal policies and procedures and contractual safeguards in commercial arrangements in connection with corporate and regulatory requirements and risk management best practices.

Photo of James Stevens James Stevens

James provides corporate and regulatory advice to our clients. He has substantial experience in the representation of public and private companies, including banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, payments companies, crypto and DeFi companies, and other fintech and financial services providers in connection with formation…

James provides corporate and regulatory advice to our clients. He has substantial experience in the representation of public and private companies, including banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, payments companies, crypto and DeFi companies, and other fintech and financial services providers in connection with formation, licensing, sponsorship and program agreements, mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing transactions, joint ventures, and regulatory reporting and compliance.

Photo of Glen Trudel Glen Trudel

A former bank in-house counsel, Glen brings real-world experience to financial institutions, marketplace lenders, fintechs, and other companies grappling with both regulatory and transactional issues.

Photo of Zayne Tweed Zayne Tweed

Zayne Tweed is counsel in the firm’s financial institutions practice. He focuses on corporate and regulatory representation of commercial banks, holding companies and other financial institutions.

Photo of Sarah Hanna Sarah Hanna

Sarah is an associate in the firm’s Corporate practice. Sarah received her J.D. from the University of North Carolina School of Law, where she was an articles editor for the North Carolina Law Review.