A fraudulent transfer is a wrongful attempt to avoid a debt by improperly transferring assets to a third party or transferring assets for less than fair value while insolvent or leading to insolvency. Each state has its own statute regarding fraudulent transfers, often similar to the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (UVTA) or the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). Section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code governs fraudulent transfers in bankruptcy, providing a trustee with authority to avoid or unwind such transfers. This framework prevents debtors from thwarting creditors’ collection efforts. Outside of bankruptcy, creditors may seek to avoid fraudulent transfers under state law. In bankruptcy, only a trustee or debtor-in-possession can pursue these claims for the benefit of all creditors.

Fraudulent transfer claims fall into two categories: actual fraud and constructive fraud. Actual fraud occurs when a debtor knowingly transfers assets to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor. Proving actual fraud involves identifying “badges” of fraud, such as transfers to insiders or retention of control over the property. Constructive fraud occurs if the debtor received less than “reasonably equivalent value” for the transfer and was insolvent at the time or rendered insolvent by the transfer. Determining “reasonably equivalent value” often requires a detailed factual analysis and expert testimony.

Defenses to fraudulent transfer claims include disputing the elements under Section 548, such as the presence of fraud indicators or the adequacy of value received. Other defenses include the safe harbor provision under Section 546(e), which protects certain financial transactions, and the good faith defense under Section 550(b), which protects transferees who acted in good faith and provided value. Given the complexities of these claims and defenses, it is crucial for parties to seek competent legal counsel to protect their rights.

Read full article here.